Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) parliamentary discourse (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: parliamentary discourse


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignostxt382 - : Starting from Goffman’s (1972, 1981) distinction between ‘direct participants’, ‘side participants’ and ‘overhearers’ further development of dialogue roles, i.e. participants vs. non- participants, Ilie (2010a) develops a corresponding taxonomy of parliamentary participant roles and institutional identities. Parliamentary discourse may be analysed following Ilie’s (2010a) proposal of discourse frames: spatial-temporal, participant and interaction . When it comes to the participant frames, it is worth mentioning that, apart from deputies and senators, other overhearers may attend the sessions: representatives of the Government, representatives of the mass-media or ordinary citizens. The most important person during the session is the President of the Chamber of Deputies as he/she presents the agenda, establishes the order for voting, chairs the proceedings, gives the floor to speakers, moderates the debate, makes sure that the debates are orderly organized.

2
paper corpusSignostxt382 - : Drawing on these distinctions, we can say that political discourse is enacted, among other discourses, by parliamentary discourse, that "displays particular institutionalised discursive features and ritualised interaction strategies" (Ilie, 2010c: 62 ). Parliamentary discourse is therefore a particular genre of political discourse, which in its turn displays several subgenres (Ilie, 2010a: 8-9), the debate being one of them. A debate is "a formal discussion on a particular topic and which is strictly controlled by an institutional set of rules and a moderator, who in Parliament is the Speaker or the President" (Ilie, 2010a: 10), therefore a mediated discourse, whose major strength is "the necessity of confrontation" and "the existence of opposite sides" (Ilie, 2010a: 10).

3
paper corpusSignostxt382 - : Ornatowski, C. (2010). Parliamentary discourse and political transition: Polish parliament after 1989 . In C. Ilie (Ed.), European Parliaments under Scrutiny (pp. 223-265). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [ [57]Links ]

Evaluando al candidato parliamentary discourse:


1) ilie: 7
2) participants: 4
3) debate: 3
5) participant: 3

parliamentary discourse
Lengua: eng
Frec: 14
Docs: 5
Nombre propio: 3 / 14 = 21%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 1.054 = ( + (1+4.16992500144231) / (1+3.90689059560852)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
parliamentary discourse
: Ilie, C. (2010b). Managing dissent and interpersonal relations in the Romanian Parliamentary Discourse.In C. Ilie (Ed.), European Parliaments under Scrutiny (pp. 193-223). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: Topic shift markers in parliamentary discourse: Analysis of President Zapatero’s speech [2011]
: Tsakona, V. (2009). Humor and image politics in parliamentary discourse: A Greek case study. Text & Talk, 29(2), 219-237.